History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Bush
376 U.S. 222
SCOTUS
1964
Check Treatment
*223 Pee Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed on the authority of Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, p. 1, without prejudice to the right of the appellants to apply by April 1, 1964, to the District Court for further equitable relief in light of the present circumstances including the imminence of the forthcoming election and “the operation of the election machinery of Texas” noted by the District Court in its opinion. * The stay heretofore granted by Mr. Justice Black is continued in effect pending timely application for the foregoing relief and final disposition thereof by the District Court.

Mr. Justice Clark joins this disposition, but upon the grounds stated in his separate opinion in Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, p. 18. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would reverse the judgment below for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, pp. 20, 50.

Notes

*

224 F. Supp. 499, 513.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Bush
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 2, 1964
Citation: 376 U.S. 222
Docket Number: 675
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.