History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Blakney
85 Or. App. 203
Or. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendants gave plaintiff a notice of deposition. Less than two hours before the time fixed for the deposition, plaintiff’s attorney informed defendants’ counsel that he was unable to attend. The deposition was reset, but neither plaintiff nor his attorney appeared for that deposition. Defendants’ counsel moved for sanctions under ORCP 46. When the motion was called for hearing by the presiding judge, neither plaintiff nor his counsel was present. The court dismissed plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and are persuaded that the court did not abuse its discretion.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Blakney
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Apr 22, 1987
Citation: 85 Or. App. 203
Docket Number: A8511-07296; CA A39977
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.