History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Barnett
205 Ala. 220
Ala.
1921
Check Treatment

It is the settled doctrine in this state that courts of equity have original jurisdiction to order a sale of the property of infants, not only for their maintenance and education, but also for conserving the best interests of their estates. Goodman v. Winter, 64 Ala. 410, 434, 38 Am. Rep. 13; Rivers v. Durr, 46 Ala. 418; Ex parte Jewett, 16 Ala. 409. The same jurisdiction is exercised with respect to estates in trust, and sales may be ordered in either case for the purpose of reinvesting the proceeds to the greater advantage of the infants or cestuis que trust. Bibb v. Bibb, 204 Ala. 541,86 So. 376.

Under these decisions, the bill here exhibited contains equity, and invokes the power of the court by appropriate and sufficient allegations.

The demurrer to the bill was properly overruled, and the decree of the circuit court in equity will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Barnett
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 20, 1921
Citation: 205 Ala. 220
Docket Number: 3 Div. 459.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.