History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martens v. Martens
27 N.Y.S.2d 72
N.Y. App. Div.
1941
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We do not here find such unusual circumstances as would take the ease out of the general rule that counsel fee and allowance for disbursements should only be granted for prospective and not past services.

It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Martens v. Martens
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 2, 1941
Citation: 27 N.Y.S.2d 72
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.