History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martel v. Cadle
1:08-cv-10388
D. Mass.
Mar 31, 2011
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-10388-GAO

SHEILA MARTEL et al., Plaintiffs, v.

DANIEL CADLE, et al., Defendants. ORDER March 31, 2011 O’TOOLE, D.J.

To the extent that the plaintiffs object pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) to Magistrate Judge Sorokin’s December 3, 2010 Order that Attorney Schlichtmann and co- counsel supplement the record as to a possible conflict of interest, the objections are OVERRULED. The magistrate judge’s detailed order is neither “clearly erroneous” nor “contrary to law.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

It is SO ORDERED.

s/ George A. O’Toole, Jr. United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Martel v. Cadle
Court Name: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Mar 31, 2011
Docket Number: 1:08-cv-10388
Court Abbreviation: D. Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.