History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marshall v. Woodbury Banking Co.
68 S.E. 957
Ga. Ct. App.
1910
Check Treatment
(Russell, J.

A verdict for tlie plaintiff was not demanded by tlie evidence, and the court erred in directing- tlie verdict. In any case where the evidence may he subject to more than one construction, or where more than one inference may be drawn, even from undisputed facts, the duty of solving the mystery should! be placed upon the jury.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Marshall v. Woodbury Banking Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 20, 1910
Citation: 68 S.E. 957
Docket Number: 2127
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.