57 Kan. 304 | Kan. | 1896
The claims made by the assignors to certain property as exempt clearly cannot affect the validity of the assignment. Nor does the failure of the assignee to recover property retained by the assignors, the title to which actually passed by the deed of assignment, alter the case in any degree. The creditors have ample remedy for any neglect on his part.
The rulings on the introduction of testimony complained of are quite, unimportant, and do not furnish ground for a reversal.
The judgment is affirmed.