No. 45034 | Ct. Cl. | Apr 6, 1942

*133The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion

per curiam,

as follows:

The sole issue raised in this case has been decided by this court in the cases of James A. Greenwald v. United States, 88 Ct. Cl. 264" court="Ct. Cl." date_filed="1939-01-09" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/greenwald-v-united-states-8588391?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8588391">88 C. Cls. 264; Charles G. Wadbrook v. United States, 90 C. Cls. 48; Henry M. Butler v. United States, 91 Ct. Cl. 88" court="Ct. Cl." date_filed="1940-04-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/butler-v-united-states-8588569?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8588569">91 C. Cls. 88; and Warner U. Hines v. United States, decided December 1, 1941 (95 Ct. Cl. 156" court="Ct. Cl." date_filed="1941-12-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hines-v-united-states-8588832?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8588832">95 C. Cls. 156). Upon the decisions in those cases, plaintiff is entitled to recover. The claim, however, is a continuing one, and entry of judgment will be suspended pending receipt of a report from the General Accounting Office, showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

In accordance with the above decision and upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing amount due thereunder, the court on November 2,1942, entered judgment, for the plaintiff in the sum of $372.92.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.