History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marsh v. Morse
18 Mo. 477
Mo.
1853
Check Treatment
Scott, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. There is no doubt that during the term of a court, at which any proceeding is had, the court may, for sufficient cause, vacate or set aside that proceeding. It is obvious that the vacating of a continuance and ordering a trial of the cause may produce surprise, and operate seriously to the prejudice of a party whose cause has been continued. A court would hardly be warranted in taking such a course without strong reasons ; when, for such reasons, it is done, a party should be served with an authentic copy of the order. It would be dangerous to trust to rumor or any other source of information than a service of the copy of the order, to affect a party with notice that the continuance has been set aside. He then could appear and show cause why a trial should not be had at that time. We cannot say that the trial of this case, under the circumstances, was warranted by a sound discretion.

Judge Eyland concurring, the judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded ; Judge Gamble not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Marsh v. Morse
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Oct 15, 1853
Citation: 18 Mo. 477
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.