History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marriott Corp. v. Hayward Baker Co.
43 Ohio St. 3d 175
Ohio
1989
Check Treatment

On authority of Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Straley (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 372, 533 N.E. 2d 764, the trial court’s grant of summary judgment as to all defendants is reinstated. The appellate decision is reversed as to Koehring Company and Carlisle Construction Company, and is reversed on the tort issue as to Hayward Baker Company. That portion of the appellate court’s judgment involving a contract issue between Marriott Corporation and Hayward Baker Company is affirmed, and the question involving a contract issue is remanded to the trial court for further consideration in light of Straley.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Marriott Corp. v. Hayward Baker Co.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 14, 1989
Citation: 43 Ohio St. 3d 175
Docket Number: No. 88-924
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.