midpage

Marra v. StateMarra v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jan 19, 1977
No. DD-176
Versions:341 So. 2d 284
1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15079
SMITH, Judge.

A prisoner in the State’s custody at Union Correctional Institute urges he was subjected to an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, when on a tip but without warrant or exigent circumstances correctional officers required him to open his personal locker, previously locked with a key in appellant’s possession. The locker contained 111 grams of cannabis. Appellant was convicted of its possession. We reject his contention. Although a citizen is not wholly stripped of constitutional protections when imprisoned for crime, search and surveillance necessary for security of the prison must qualify the prisoner’s reasonable expectations of privacy. This prisoner had no immunity from a good faith search for contraband conducted by correctional officers, in his presence, with or without his consent. See Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139, 82 S.Ct. 1218, 8 L.Ed.2d 384 (1962) (dictum); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). Appellant’s other point on appeal is not meritorious. State v. Lott, 286 So.2d 565 (Fla.1973), cert. denied 417 U.S. 913, 94 S.Ct. 2613, 41 L.Ed.2d 217 (1974).

Affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Marra v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 19, 1977
Citations: 341 So. 2d 284; 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15079; No. DD-176
Docket Number: No. DD-176
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In