History
  • No items yet
midpage
676 A.2d 1064
N.J.
1996
144 N.J. 325 (1996)
676 A.2d 1064

CONCETTA MAROTTA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍ITS SERVICING CARRIER LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍ITS SERVICING CARRIER, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ANTHONY J. MAROTTA, CONCETTA MAROTTA, INTERNATIONAL ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍INSURANCE CO. (A/K/A CRUM & FORSTER PERSONAL INSURANCE), AND THE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. (A/K/A FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍COMPANIES), DEFENDANTS, AND JACK BERK AND EILEEN BERK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 30, 1996.
Decided June 11, 1996.

*326 Eric S. Plaum argued the cause for appellant.

Laurie Harrold Rozzo argued the cause for respondent (Slimm & Goldberg, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 280 N.J. Super. 525, 656 A.2d 20 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Marotta v. NJ AUTO. INS. UNDERWRITING ASSOC.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 11, 1996
Citations: 676 A.2d 1064; 144 N.J. 325
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In