History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marotta v. NJ AUTO. INS. UNDERWRITING ASSOC.
676 A.2d 1064
N.J.
1996
Check Treatment
144 N.J. 325 (1996)
676 A.2d 1064

CONCETTA MAROTTA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍ITS SERVICING CARRIER LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍ITS SERVICING CARRIER, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ANTHONY J. MAROTTA, CONCETTA MAROTTA, INTERNATIONAL ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍INSURANCE CO. (A/K/A CRUM & FORSTER PERSONAL INSURANCE), AND THE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. (A/K/A FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍COMPANIES), DEFENDANTS, AND JACK BERK AND EILEEN BERK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 30, 1996.
Decided June 11, 1996.

*326 Eric S. Plaum argued the cause for appellant.

Laurie Harrold Rozzo argued the cause for respondent (Slimm & Goldberg, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed ‍‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 280 N.J. Super. 525, 656 A.2d 20 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Marotta v. NJ AUTO. INS. UNDERWRITING ASSOC.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 11, 1996
Citation: 676 A.2d 1064
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In