31 A. 265 | R.I. | 1895
Though notice was given to the petitioner of the taking of the testimony before the committee of the city council appointed for that purpose, the *4 record does not disclose any notice to him of the proceeding before the council for his removal from office, so that he could be heard on the question of his removal. Without such opportunity to be heard the proceeding was not such a trial as is contemplated by clause 7 of the charter of Pawtucket. For this reason, we are of the opinion that the proceeding must be quashed.
We have no statute modifying the common law procedure oncertiorari. At common law, the writ of certiorari brings up for review nothing except the record proper of the proceeding, of which the evidence before the tribunal below, strictly speaking, forms no part, and which it is, therefore, under no obligation to send up as a part of the record. Hannibal St. Joseph R.R. Co.
v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294, 308; People exrelat. Whitney v. Board of Delegates of the San Francisco FireDepartment,