History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marmaduke v. Brown
254 Pa. 18
Pa.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The bill of the complainant was for an accounting, and both she and the defendants are dissatisfied with the decree made. The court below committed no error in refusing to charge the defendants with the value of the good will of the business, and what it has decreed they *25shall pay is, under all the evidence, what they legally owe.

Each appeal is dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Marmaduke v. Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 15, 1916
Citation: 254 Pa. 18
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 172 and 170
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.