History
  • No items yet
midpage
Markley v. Kessering
2 Pennyp. 187
Pa.
1882
Check Treatment
— Per Curiam :

There is nothing in any of the assignments of error. The fact that the contract of marriage was entered into on Sunday could not avail in view especially of the evidence of subsequent reqognition. The case was properly submitted to the jury.

Jugment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Markley v. Kessering
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 29, 1882
Citation: 2 Pennyp. 187
Docket Number: No. 450
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.