| Ind. | Dec 24, 1852
This was an action of replevin brought by Jornigan against Markin in a justice’s Court. Judgment by the justice for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, and the plaintiff obtained there a Verdict and judgment.
The defendant contends that the justice had no jurisdiction; the causes of action being for too large an amount.
The justice had no jurisdiction, if the value of the property claimed exceeded 50 dollars. R. S. 862, s. 2. Middleton v. Harris, 6 Blackf. 397" court="Ind." date_filed="1843-05-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/middleton-v-harris-7030757?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7030757">6 Blackf. 397.
The plaintiff’s affidavit filed before the justice, states the value of the property claimed to be 40 dollars.
The declaration, which was filed before the justice, is substantially as follows: For that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., wrongfully took, and still wrongfully detains, from the plaintiff a certain young mare of the value of 40 dollars, the property of the plaintiff; to the plaintiff’s damage 20 dollars; hence he sues. And for that, on, &c., at, &c., one filly of the value of 40 dollars, the plaintiff’s property, came into the defendant’s possession, and has been since, and still is, unlawfully detained by him, to the plaintiff’s damage 20 dollars; hence he sues.
This declaration contains two counts. The young mare mentioned in the first count, and the filly mentioned in the second count, are alleged to be each of the value of 40 dollars. If, therefore, we consider the counts as containing separate causes of action, as we must do, the va
The plaintiff, therefore, shows that the value of the property, on account of which he sues, exceeds the jurisdiction of the justice. The consequence is, that the judgment cannot be sustained.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded with instructions to the Circuit Court to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.