History
  • No items yet
midpage
Markham v. Gehan
42 Mich. 74
Mich.
1879
Check Treatment
Cooley, J.

It appears in the record beyond^ any controversy that the demand owing by defendants, and which the plaintiff seeks to recover from them as garnishees, was due not to the principal defendant alone, but to him and another person with whom he was joint contractor for building a church. There was therefore no ground for a recovery, and the judgment in favor of defendants must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Markham v. Gehan
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 30, 1879
Citation: 42 Mich. 74
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.