History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mark v. Wisconsin
60 S. Ct. 264
SCOTUS
1939
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file the motion to dismiss the appeal' is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Bolln v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83; Lem Woon v. Oregon, 229 U. S. 586. The motion for- leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Mark v. Wisconsin
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 4, 1939
Citation: 60 S. Ct. 264
Docket Number: No. 508
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.