History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mark Konsavich v. Meeks
694 F. App'x 168
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark James Konsavich, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark James Konsavich appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Konsavich leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Konsavich v. Meeks , No. 1:16-cv-01829-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Mark Konsavich v. Meeks
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 1, 2017
Citation: 694 F. App'x 168
Docket Number: 17-6485
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.