History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marion v. State
586 So. 2d 67
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions. We also affirm the issue wherein the appellant attacks the constitutionality of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.). See Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). However, we reverse the appellant’s habitual offender sentences and remand for resentencing. In order to be sentenced as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988), a defendant must have successive felony convictions. The appellant’s two prior convictions were rendered on the same date, and so they should have been treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Marion v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 5, 1991
Citation: 586 So. 2d 67
Docket Number: No. 90-01160
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.