435 So. 2d 272 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1983
This cause is before us on appeal from the order of the deputy commissioner compel
After oral argument,
It is a long-standing rule of appellate jurisprudence that the court will not undertake to resolve issues which, though of interest to the bench and bar, are not dispositive of the particular case before the court. Accordingly, we hold that the deputy, in issuing subpoena duces tecum and denying the hospital’s motion to quash, modify or limit that subpoena, did not violate essential requirements of law. Petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
. Counsel for claimant, and for the amicus curiae, although filing briefs, were not present at oral argument and did not seek to avail themselves of opportunity to present oral argument to the court.