*1 854
BEEZER, in Judge, concurring Circuit dissenting part: in part and RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, Mario Aurelio except I concur in the order of the court Petitioner, clerk to issue the man- I would direct the jurisdiction lack to date forthwith. We v. pending petition the and there consider ASHCROFT, Attorney John any probability of success on never was General, Respondent. support stay. which a the merits would Ashcroft, 370 See Mariscal-Sandoval v. No. 02-73376. (9th Cir.2004) 851, (Beezer, J., F.3d 856-60 concurring). of Appeals, Court United States Ninth Circuit. 7, July 2004.
Filed Cruz, Law Offices of Carlos A.
Carlos A.
Cruz, CA, Angeles, for Los Petitioner. CA, Counsel, Laguna Niguel, Regional 2 CA, Counsel, Angeles, Los CAC-District Raymond STRAND; Stephen In re LeFevre, Officer, Legal E. Chief Ronald Strand, Debtors, Kristie Gale CA, OIL, Francisco, Jocelyn Lopez San DC, Washington, Respondent. for Wright, Leichty, Appellant, Bruce v. BEEZER, PREGERSON, and Before: TALLMAN, Judges. Circuit Neary, T. William United States
Trustee, Appellee. ORDER No. 03-15431. has to majority panel
A of the voted Appeals, United States Court of deny panel rehearing. for petition the Ninth Circuit. peti- Judge Pregerson grant voted to the 12, May 2004. Argued and Submitted bane, Judge en Tallman rehearing
tion for 9, July Filed 2004. rehearing for en deny petition voted to the Judge banc Beezer so recommends. and has been advised of the
The full court
petition rehearing en banc and no for a
judge requested vote to rehear the has Fed. P. 35. R.App.
matter en banc. days
The mandate shall issue seven af- in entry
ter of this order accordance with 41(b). Appellate
Federal Rule of Procedure panel rehearing
The for the petition and
petition rehearing for en banc are DE-
NIED.