Marine Trust Co. v. CollinsMarine Trust Co. v. Collins
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Following his examination before trial by defendant a witness before signing the deposition undertook to make certain corrections therein which included substantial changes in his answers given upon the examination. He gave as his reasons, among others, that the corrections had been made “to give an accurate statement thereof and to correct errors by the reporter in the transcription of my testimony”. Special Term dismissed the complaint unless within a stated time the witness subscribed the deposition with leave to note thereon errors claimed to have been made by the reporter in transcription. We believe the applicable rule is enunciated in rule 3116 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules which authorizes a witness before signing the deposition to enter thereon “ any changes in form or substance i: 3 with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for making them”. This has long been the established procedure. (Skeaney v. Silver Beach Realty Corp., 10 A D 2d 537.) However, the omnibus statement of the witness that corrections were made to correct his errors in testifying or errors of the reporter is improper. The precise procedure was enunciated in Columbia v. Lee (