History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marie v. Semple
1 Add. 215
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1794
Check Treatment
President.

The plain principles of right and wrong seem strongly to point out, that Marie ought not to put money in his pocket from the labour of Semple. The proprietaries permitted people to settle on their lands, on the presumption, that they would afterwards buy, and they gave a preference to the settler. We are inclined to admit proof, by Semple, that, when the land was recovered, it was in a better state by his labour, *216than when he went on it. Against this, let Marie shew the advantage which Semple received from the occupation, and, if any, the injury, which he may have done to it. Let the proof therefore be admitted; but, if the plaintiff’s counsel choose to argue it again, we will reserve this point.

The jury found a verdict for one dollar damages.— And the counsel for the plaintiff being satisfied with it, there was judgment on this verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Marie v. Semple
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
Date Published: Jun 15, 1794
Citation: 1 Add. 215
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.