*1 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice, after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Assa’ad-Faltas’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. [*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Assa’ad-Faltas v. McMaster , No. 3:20-cv-01809-TLW (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2020). We deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motion to place this appeal in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[*] Although the district court dismissed Assa’ad-Faltas’ action without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 612 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).