History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Henry McMaster
20-6805
| 4th Cir. | Jul 13, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Rodkangyil Orion Danjuma, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, New York, New York; Susan King Dunn, ACLU OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Charleston, South Carolina; Toby James Marshall, Eric Riley Nusser, TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC, Seattle, Washington; Kenneth Paul Woodington, DAVIDSON, WREN & PLYLER, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her motions for intervention and, in Appeal No. 20-6805, the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. McMaster , No. 5:20-cv-01533-DCC-KDW (D.S.C. May 6, 2020; May 26, 2020); Assa’ad-Faltas v. Lexington Cnty., S.C. , No. 3:17-cv-01426-MBS (D.S.C. May 20, 2020). We deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Henry McMaster
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 13, 2021
Docket Number: 20-6805
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.