History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marder v. Heinemann
100 N.Y.S. 250
N.Y. App. Div.
1906
Check Treatment
Gaynor, J.:

The refusal of the defendant to allow the plaintiff to remove the plate glass to take out his ice box was a conversion thereof. By assenting to the removal of the plate glass to take the ice box in, the defendant assented to the taking of it out in the same way (Kelsey v. Durkee, 33 Barb. 410).

The judgment should be reversed.

Woodward, Jbnks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Marder v. Heinemann
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 24, 1906
Citation: 100 N.Y.S. 250
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.