History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.
161 A.2d 247
N.J.
1960
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.

Mr. Justice Hall votes to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Mintz.

For reversal—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Francis, Proctor and Schettino—6.

For affirmance—Justice Hall—1.

Case Details

Case Name: Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 6, 1960
Citation: 161 A.2d 247
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In