History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marcus v. DuPerry
598 A.2d 367
Conn.
1991
Check Treatment

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 293, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the retainer contract between the parties unenforceable for lack of consideration?

“2. Was the retainer contract between the parties unenforceable as contrary to public policy?

“3. Was the plaintiff entitled to a quantum meruit recovery?”

Case Details

Case Name: Marcus v. DuPerry
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Oct 24, 1991
Citation: 598 A.2d 367
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.