History
  • No items yet
midpage
Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow
107 U.S. App. D.C. 93
D.C. Cir.
1960
Check Treatment

274 F.2d 751

107 U.S.App.D.C. 93

Manuel BAKER, Appellant,
v.
Celia RADOW, Appellee.

No. 15147.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Dec. 21, 1959.
Decided Jan. 7, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; James W. Morris, Judge.

Mr. Allan C. Swingle, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Arthur S. Feld, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Joseph D. Bulman and Sidney M. Goldstein, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and BASTIAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee's suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.

2

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jan 7, 1960
Citation: 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93
Docket Number: 15147_1
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.