Mansur v. Keaton

46 Me. 346 | Me. | 1859

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Davis, J.

The facts proved, and offered to be proved, do not constitute a consummated payment, or accord and satisfaction. The plaintiff having neglected or declined to carry out the arrangement, the Staekpole execution is still the property of the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Mansur v. Keaton

Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date Published: Jul 1, 1859

Citation: 46 Me. 346

Court Abbreviation: Me.