History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mansur v. Keaton
46 Me. 346
Me.
1859
Check Treatment

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Davis, J.

The facts proved, and offered to be proved, do not constitute a consummated payment, or accord and satisfaction. The plaintiff having neglected or declined to carry out the arrangement, the Staekpole execution is still the property of the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Mansur v. Keaton
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1859
Citation: 46 Me. 346
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.