History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mansur v. Churchman
84 Ind. 573
Ind.
1882
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Woods, J.

The error assigned in the general term of the Superior Court was the overruling of the appellants’ motion for a new trial; but, as the record fails to show an exception to the ruling, no question is presented. Henley v. McNoun, 76 Ind. 380.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.






Rehearing

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Woods, C. J.

A rehearing is asked for the purpose of per-

mitting a correction of the record so as to show that an exception was saved to the overruling of the motion for a new trial. That a rehearing will not be granted for this purpose has been frequently decided; see Warner v. Campbell, 39 Ind. 409; Cole v. Allen, 51 Ind. 122; State, ex rel., v. Terre Haute, etc., R. R. Co., 64 Ind. 297; Merrifield v. Weston, 68 Ind. 70.

This appeal is from a decree of foreclosure in a sum less than $50 found due upon an assessment for a street improvement, and no good reason is shown why the case should be made an exception to the rule.

Petition overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Mansur v. Churchman
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1882
Citation: 84 Ind. 573
Docket Number: No. 9334
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.