Mansur v. Churchman

84 Ind. 573 | Ind. | 1882

Lead Opinion

Woods, J.

The error assigned in the general term of the Superior Court was the overruling of the appellants’ motion for a new trial; but, as the record fails to show an exception to the ruling, no question is presented. Henley v. McNoun, 76 Ind. 380.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.






Rehearing

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Woods, C. J.

A rehearing is asked for the purpose of per-

mitting a correction of the record so as to show that an exception was saved to the overruling of the motion for a new trial. That a rehearing will not be granted for this purpose has been frequently decided; see Warner v. Campbell, 39 Ind. 409; Cole v. Allen, 51 Ind. 122; State, ex rel., v. Terre Haute, etc., R. R. Co., 64 Ind. 297; Merrifield v. Weston, 68 Ind. 70.

This appeal is from a decree of foreclosure in a sum less than $50 found due upon an assessment for a street improvement, and no good reason is shown why the case should be made an exception to the rule.

Petition overruled.

midpage