History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mansfield v. Strauss
68 N.Y.S. 682
N.Y. App. Term.
1900
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, in a written complaint, alleged that on a given date the International Society, his assignor, duly sold and delivered to defendant certain books, which were reasotiably worth, and said defendant agreed to pay therefor, the sum of $45. Unquestionably, this language imported an absolute sale. Hadley v. Bordo, 62 Vt. 285, 19 Atl. 476. To support his declaration, plaintiff read in evidence a contract signed by defendant, in which he requested that the books. be sent him, and agreed to pay $2.25 per volume, as follows: “$2 cash with this order, and $2 the first of each succeeding month thereafter, until the full amount has been paid. Title in said books not to pass to me until paid for in full.” This contract showed a conditional sale, and did not support the declaration. Hadley v. Bordo, supra. There was no sale in a strict sense, for it is essential to a sale that there should be a transfer of the absolute or general property in the thing sold. A mere transfer of a special property—which is the utmost that has been shown in this case—is not a sale of the thing. Benj. Sales, § 1. There is not, in the present case, a provision that upon the nonpayment of an installment all future installments should become due. The proof did not sustain the allegations of the complaint, and upon the pleadings and proof the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Mansfield v. Strauss
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 5, 1900
Citation: 68 N.Y.S. 682
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.