History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mansfield v. Allen
85 Mo. 502
Mo.
1885
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Sherwood, J.

In our opinion, Allen was improperly made a party defendant, but this ought not to authorize a reversal of the judgment, under the liberal provisions ©f our statute respecting practice in civil cases. Sections 3570, 3582, 3583. See, also, Wescott v. Bridwell, 40 Mo. 146 ; City, etc., v. Bressler, 56 Mo. 350. We, therefore, modify the judgment by reversing it as to Allen, and affirming it as to Bassett.

Norton and Ray, JJ., concur.





Concurrence Opinion

Henry, C. J.,

Concurring.—I concur in reversing the judgment, but think that the cause should be remanded for a re-trial thereof.

Case Details

Case Name: Mansfield v. Allen
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Apr 15, 1885
Citation: 85 Mo. 502
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.