Manning v. Tripp
332 N.C. 341
N.C.1992Check TreatmentLead Opinion
For the reasons stated in this Court’s decision in Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 332 N.C. 184, 420 S.E.2d 124 (1992), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 332 N.C. 184, 195, 420 S.E.2d 124, 131 (1992).
