Manning v. State, 176 So. 2d 380

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, by this appeal, seeks review of an adverse order on his petition filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. He urges, as the basis of his collateral attack on his conviction, that he was induced to plead guilty by promises made to him by his privately employed counsel.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in denying relief. The State is not responsible for promises or inducements made by one‘s own privately obtained attorney, see and compare: Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 775.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Manning v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jun 22, 1965

Citations: 176 So. 2d 380; 64-1073

Docket Number: 64-1073

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.