History
  • No items yet
midpage
11 A.D.3d 335
N.Y. App. Div.
2004

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered March 6, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff as an infant while in the care of a residential treatment facility, granted defendants’ motions to strike plaintiff’s bill of particulars dated December 17, 2002, with leave to plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars properly limited to the scope of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff s bill of particulars alleging no less than six actionable occurrences over a period of no less than six months was properly stricken where the complaint alleges only one occurrence on only one day. We note a prior unappealed order denying a motion by plaintiff to amend the complaint. We decline plaintiffs request to prune the bill. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Manning v. City of New York
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 19, 2004
Citations: 11 A.D.3d 335; 782 N.Y.S.2d 913; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Manning v. City of New York, 11 A.D.3d 335