History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mann v. Haley
45 Cal. 653
Cal.
1873
Check Treatment
By the Court:

The judgment was rendered, or at least entered by the Clerk-in form, against the proper defendants, and there is no question but that it is for the recovery of the proper prem*654ises, but- it seems that the names of some of the plaintiffs appearing in the amended complaint were omitted in the entry of judgment. We see in this circumstance, however, no ground for a motion to vacate the judgment, as was attempted upon the part of the defendants.

If the circumstances of the case are such as to make it worth while for either party to move to amend the entry of judgment in respect to the enumeration of parties plaintiff, the Court below would doubtless permit the amendment in that respect to be made.

Order affirmed. Remittitur to issue forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Mann v. Haley
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1873
Citation: 45 Cal. 653
Docket Number: No. 3,743
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.