96 Ga. 795 | Ga. | 1895

Lumpkin, J.

1. The charge complained of, to the effect that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, delivery to a common carrier is delivery to the consignee, was correct. Falvey & Co. v. Richmond, 87 Ga. 99.

2. The request to charge, while in some respects legal and pertinent, contained at its conclusion expressions calculated to confuse and mislead the jury, and was therefore properly refused; the evidence fully warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a newtrial. Judgment affirmed.

G. J. Holton & Son, for plaintiffs in error. Graham & Parker, contra.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.