midpage

Maniscalco v. StateManiscalco v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 25, 1929
Reporters:
Before:
Brown
Brown, J.

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed ‍‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‍is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson ‍‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‍v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. ‍‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‍R. 565. As indicated in the eases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no *469adjudication by the court of the guilt of the ‍‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‍defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, ‍‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‍must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

Terreli,, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Maniscalco v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 25, 1929
Citation: 98 Fla. 468
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In