History
  • No items yet
midpage
Maniscalco v. State
98 Fla. 468
Fla.
1929
Check Treatment
Brown, J.

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the eases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no *469adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

Terreli,, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Maniscalco v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 25, 1929
Citation: 98 Fla. 468
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.