History
  • No items yet
midpage
Manhattan Savings Institution v. Gottfried Baking Co.
286 N.Y. 398
| NY | 1941
|
Check Treatment

The plaintiff proved that the defendant breached its contract. The question whether the plaintiff suffered substantial damages by such breach is one of fact, and the determination of that question against the plaintiff in the courts below may not be reviewed in this court. The plaintiff was, however, entitled as matter of law to an award of nominal damages.

The judgments should be reversed and judgment directed for the plaintiff for six cents damage, without costs.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Manhattan Savings Institution v. Gottfried Baking Co.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 29, 1941
Citation: 286 N.Y. 398
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.