171 F.2d 482 | 2d Cir. | 1948
The Manhattan Bank appeals from an order entered in the reorganization of the New Haven road, which disallowed its
After a bankruptcy court assumes custody of a bankrupt’s estate, it has power to enjoin all suits elsewhere which seek to dispose of, or adjudicate claims upon, his property;
Thus the injunction issued by the district court, when it stayed the bank, was a step necessary to the preparation of a plan under § 77; the bank’s original claim based upon the loss which resulted from it was not for damages caused by an erroneous injunction, and the injunction was proper. Indeed, if it had not been, we should have had no right to award damages for the loss caused by it, because, being the act of a court, it could not be an actionable wrong. We recognized that it was properly issued in Re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company,
The claim which we disallowed in Warren v. Palmer,
In Re Consolidated Motor Parts, Inc.
Order reversed; claim allowed.
In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, 2 Cir., 147 F.2d 40, 47, 48.
Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 282 U.S. 734, 51 S.Ct. 270, 75 L.Ed. 645.
Straton v. New, 283 U.S. 318, 321, 51 S.Ct. 465, 75 L.Ed. 1080.
294 U.S. 648, 675-677, 55 S.Ct. 595, 79 L.Ed. 1110.
2 Cir., 102 F.2d 923.
2 Cir., 132 F.2d 665.
2 Cir., 132 F.2d 665.
2 Cir., 85 F.2d 579.