Mangam v. State

Dec 31, 1975
No. 75-4
Reporters:
,
Before:
Ger
PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the revocation of his probation.

It is manifest from the colloquy that the trial court, in effect, ruled that appellant did ‍​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍not have Fifth Amendment constitutional rights and penalized him for refusing to testify.

We reverse upon authority of Heath v. State, 310 So.2d 38 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975), and remand for a new hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., and OWEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.