History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mancuso v. State
642 N.Y.S.2d 225
N.Y. App. Div.
1996
Check Treatment

Order, Court of Claims (Christopher Mega, J.), entered April 6, 1995, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In an action seeking to recover for personal injuries sustained by claimant when, as a spectator at a basketball game played at a college campus owned by defendant, a fight broke out during the course of the game, issues of fact exist precluding summary judgment, including whether the fight was foreseeable; if so, whether defendant failed to provide adequate security to prevent it; and, if not, whether such breach of duty was a proximate cause of claimant’s injury (see, Rotz v City of New York, 143 AD2d 301; Shtekla v Topping, 23 AD2d 750, 751). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Mancuso v. State
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 30, 1996
Citation: 642 N.Y.S.2d 225
Docket Number: Claim No. 89179
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In