118 Iowa 9 | Iowa | 1902
One ground of the motion made in the court below for new trial was that the verdict was not warranted by the evidence in the case. The refusal of the court to set aside the verdict for such reason is assigned as error, and forms the basis for the principal contention of appellant in this court.
We have set out in the foregoing statement the substance of the evidence in the case. In our opinion, it wholly fails to show that the affections of Mrs. Maloney
We reach the conclusion that the motion for new trial should have been sustained, and the judgment of the court below is accordingly reversed.