History
  • No items yet
midpage
Malone v. Luneburg
218 N.Y.S.2d 1007
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock and Christ, JJ., concur; Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, on the ground that a question of fact was presented as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence, which should have been submitted to the jury (Dranofsky v. Collins, 271 App. Div. 932; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226).

Case Details

Case Name: Malone v. Luneburg
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 5, 1961
Citation: 218 N.Y.S.2d 1007
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.