Appellant was convicted by a jury in Jefferson Circuit Court of first degree rape (KRS 510.040(l)(a)), first degree sodomy (KRS 510.070(l)(a)), and being a persistent felony offender in the second degree (KRS 532.080). Punishment was fixed at life imprisonment. Appellant now appeals as a matter of right, raising three assignments of error. We see only one issue which warrants discussion and summarily dismiss the others as being without merit.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury that voluntary intoxication is a defense to the crimes of forcible rape and sodomy.
Voluntary intoxication is a defense to a criminal charge if it “negates the existence of an element of the offense.” KRS 501.-080. We have interpreted this defense to apply only to intentional and knowing offenses. Brown v. Commonwealth, Ky.,
We addressed this same argument in Isaacs v. Commonwealth, Ky.,
Prior to the enactment of the Penal Code, we held that forcible rape could not be mitigated or excused on account of the accused’s drunkenness. Abbott v. Commonwealth,
We therefore hold that once the prohibited acts are done, the crimes of forcible rape and sodomy are complete without regard to the effect of voluntary intoxication on the accused’s mental state.
The judgment is affirmed.
