History
  • No items yet
midpage
Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi
502 So. 2d 973
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Prior to trial, the court entered an order limiting witnesses, stating:

The parties are limited to one expert per discipline.... If there are separate board certifications for ... two areas of expertise then one expert will be allowed in each.

We reject appellants’ contention that the trial court applied the order in a discriminatory fashion and improperly excluded one of their expert witnesses. A review of the record discloses that the court merely implemented its order. See Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Stager v. Florida East Coast Ry., 163 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. discharged, 174 So.2d 540 (Fla.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878, 86 S.Ct. 162, 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965). Appellants’ remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 10, 1987
Citation: 502 So. 2d 973
Docket Number: No. 85-2865
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.