History
  • No items yet
midpage
Malagon-Ramirez v. United States
393 U.S. 1072
SCOTUS
1969
Check Treatment

C. A. 9th Cir. Treating the papers in this case as a petition for a writ of certiorari and as a motion of counsel to be relieved from perfecting and prosecuting the petition, we take no present action on the petition and refer the motion to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for consideration and action in the light of what petitioner's counsel refers to as paragraph 4 (c) of the "provisions for the representation on appeal of defendants financially unable to obtain representation, adopted by the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit, pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act of 1964,” which is said to require counsel appointed in the Court of Appeals to file a petition for certiorari “if requested to do so by the defendant.”

Case Details

Case Name: Malagon-Ramirez v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 24, 1969
Citation: 393 U.S. 1072
Docket Number: No. 1635
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.