History
  • No items yet
midpage
Malafsky v. Becker
255 A.D. 444
N.Y. App. Div.
1938
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After the respondent herein had filed his notice of lien he did not, within one year, commence an action to foreclose the lien, secure an order continuing the lien, or become a party defendant in an action to enforce another hen. Accordingly, his lien expired under the terms of the applicable statutes. (Lien Law, §§ 17, 19.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Malafsky v. Becker
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 2, 1938
Citation: 255 A.D. 444
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.